<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: January PMP Numbers Up Over 6000 In One Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/</link>
	<description>Free Project Management Information, Advice, and Templates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Huether</title>
		<link>http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Huether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticalpath.info/?p=2285#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>Jeff, my first exposure to the PMP was several years ago when I was dealing with a stakeholder over at National Institutes of Health (NIH).  I remember seeing she had this &quot;PMP&quot; at the end of her name and I also recall how she was horrible to deal with.  She exhibited no control over what she did and didn&#039;t follow the PMBoK at all.  At the time, all I had were soft skills.  So, I studied and studied, with the hope of becoming a disciplined PM.  So, here is one of the disconnects I&#039;ve seen.  She was one of those people that wanted to game the system.  She didn&#039;t want to actually learn anything or to help others.  She just wanted to say she was a PMP.  That is what I see happening with a lot of people.  I would go into more detail but this now has me wanting to write a full blown blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, my first exposure to the PMP was several years ago when I was dealing with a stakeholder over at National Institutes of Health (NIH).  I remember seeing she had this &#8220;PMP&#8221; at the end of her name and I also recall how she was horrible to deal with.  She exhibited no control over what she did and didn&#8217;t follow the PMBoK at all.  At the time, all I had were soft skills.  So, I studied and studied, with the hope of becoming a disciplined PM.  So, here is one of the disconnects I&#8217;ve seen.  She was one of those people that wanted to game the system.  She didn&#8217;t want to actually learn anything or to help others.  She just wanted to say she was a PMP.  That is what I see happening with a lot of people.  I would go into more detail but this now has me wanting to write a full blown blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Huether</title>
		<link>http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Huether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticalpath.info/?p=2285#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>Jeff, my first exposure to the PMP was several years ago when I was dealing with a stakeholder over at National Institutes of Health (NIH).  I remember seeing she had this &quot;PMP&quot; at the end of her name and I also recall how she was horrible to deal with.  She exhibited no control over what she did and didn&#039;t follow the PMBoK at all.  At the time, all I had were soft skills.  So, I studied and studied, with the hope of becoming a disciplined PM.  So, here is one of the disconnects I&#039;ve seen.  She was one of those people that wanted to game the system.  She didn&#039;t want to actually learn anything or to help others.  She just wanted to say she was a PMP.  That is what I see happening with a lot of people.  I would go into more detail but this now has me wanting to write a full blown blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, my first exposure to the PMP was several years ago when I was dealing with a stakeholder over at National Institutes of Health (NIH).  I remember seeing she had this &#8220;PMP&#8221; at the end of her name and I also recall how she was horrible to deal with.  She exhibited no control over what she did and didn&#8217;t follow the PMBoK at all.  At the time, all I had were soft skills.  So, I studied and studied, with the hope of becoming a disciplined PM.  So, here is one of the disconnects I&#8217;ve seen.  She was one of those people that wanted to game the system.  She didn&#8217;t want to actually learn anything or to help others.  She just wanted to say she was a PMP.  That is what I see happening with a lot of people.  I would go into more detail but this now has me wanting to write a full blown blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Crane</title>
		<link>http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticalpath.info/?p=2285#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>I think there is value in the PMP. I don&#039;t have one, but I must say that knowing and understanding project theory certainly can&#039;t hurt a project. Indeed, the contents of the study material are distilled knowledge amassed from thousands of people who have learned from their mistakes. That can only be beneficial.

But the PMP doesn&#039;t address things like soft skills effectively, and for the most part, glosses over them (I did study the PMBOK as part of my work at IBM so I&#039;m familiar with the contents). I think that&#039;s it&#039;s big weakness. Projects are now, and always have been, about people. Granted, it&#039;s tough to include all the sociological aspects of projects as study fodder and still expect students to pass an exam. But that doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re not equally as essential as project theory.

My only concern with the PMP is the hype it&#039;s gotten among stakeholders and hiring managers that suggests a PMP is a prerequisite to being able to manage a project. Having seen some appalling PMs holding the PMP credential, I think the PMI should be a little more responsible with its marketing. That&#039;s my two cents on it, anyway. :-)
.-= Geoff Crane´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://edge.papercutpm.com/2010/03/i-second-that-emotion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Second That Emotion&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is value in the PMP. I don&#8217;t have one, but I must say that knowing and understanding project theory certainly can&#8217;t hurt a project. Indeed, the contents of the study material are distilled knowledge amassed from thousands of people who have learned from their mistakes. That can only be beneficial.</p>
<p>But the PMP doesn&#8217;t address things like soft skills effectively, and for the most part, glosses over them (I did study the PMBOK as part of my work at IBM so I&#8217;m familiar with the contents). I think that&#8217;s it&#8217;s big weakness. Projects are now, and always have been, about people. Granted, it&#8217;s tough to include all the sociological aspects of projects as study fodder and still expect students to pass an exam. But that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not equally as essential as project theory.</p>
<p>My only concern with the PMP is the hype it&#8217;s gotten among stakeholders and hiring managers that suggests a PMP is a prerequisite to being able to manage a project. Having seen some appalling PMs holding the PMP credential, I think the PMI should be a little more responsible with its marketing. That&#8217;s my two cents on it, anyway. <img src='http://thecriticalpath.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
.-= Geoff Crane´s last blog ..<a href="http://edge.papercutpm.com/2010/03/i-second-that-emotion/" rel="nofollow">I Second That Emotion</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Crane</title>
		<link>http://thecriticalpath.info/2010/03/01/january-pmp-numbers-up-over-6000-in-one-month/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticalpath.info/?p=2285#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>I think there is value in the PMP. I don&#039;t have one, but I must say that knowing and understanding project theory certainly can&#039;t hurt a project. Indeed, the contents of the study material are distilled knowledge amassed from thousands of people who have learned from their mistakes. That can only be beneficial.

But the PMP doesn&#039;t address things like soft skills effectively, and for the most part, glosses over them (I did study the PMBOK as part of my work at IBM so I&#039;m familiar with the contents). I think that&#039;s it&#039;s big weakness. Projects are now, and always have been, about people. Granted, it&#039;s tough to include all the sociological aspects of projects as study fodder and still expect students to pass an exam. But that doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re not equally as essential as project theory.

My only concern with the PMP is the hype it&#039;s gotten among stakeholders and hiring managers that suggests a PMP is a prerequisite to being able to manage a project. Having seen some appalling PMs holding the PMP credential, I think the PMI should be a little more responsible with its marketing. That&#039;s my two cents on it, anyway. :-)
.-= Geoff Crane´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://edge.papercutpm.com/2010/03/i-second-that-emotion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Second That Emotion&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is value in the PMP. I don&#8217;t have one, but I must say that knowing and understanding project theory certainly can&#8217;t hurt a project. Indeed, the contents of the study material are distilled knowledge amassed from thousands of people who have learned from their mistakes. That can only be beneficial.</p>
<p>But the PMP doesn&#8217;t address things like soft skills effectively, and for the most part, glosses over them (I did study the PMBOK as part of my work at IBM so I&#8217;m familiar with the contents). I think that&#8217;s it&#8217;s big weakness. Projects are now, and always have been, about people. Granted, it&#8217;s tough to include all the sociological aspects of projects as study fodder and still expect students to pass an exam. But that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not equally as essential as project theory.</p>
<p>My only concern with the PMP is the hype it&#8217;s gotten among stakeholders and hiring managers that suggests a PMP is a prerequisite to being able to manage a project. Having seen some appalling PMs holding the PMP credential, I think the PMI should be a little more responsible with its marketing. That&#8217;s my two cents on it, anyway. <img src='http://thecriticalpath.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
.-= Geoff Crane´s last blog ..<a href="http://edge.papercutpm.com/2010/03/i-second-that-emotion/" rel="nofollow">I Second That Emotion</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

